- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:48:27 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Could we add, for the record, this test case illustrates the ambiguity due to order of evaulation with multiple optional triples: theer is no nesting of optionals http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0652.html We need to cover the issue sometime if we adopt 3.6. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 08:48:48 UTC