- From: Howard Katz <howardk@fatdog.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:58:32 -0700
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> To make the bootstrapping process a bit shorter, could you contrast > this approach with XQuery with Functional Accessors [4] and > TreeHugger [5]? I'm looking for short, broad statements like > where XQueryFA gets to the graph via functions, XSRQL uses syntactic > XPath extensions, or XSRQL favors the letter 'e' less than TreeHugger Will do, sometime later today. This response brought to you by the letter 'X', Howard \ > > > [1] http://www.fatdog.com/xsrql.html#Introduction > > > > [2] http://www.fatdog.com/xsrql.html#Path%20language > > > > [3] http://www.fatdog.com/xsrql.html#Examples > > [4] http://www.w3.org/2001/11/13-RDF-Query-Rules/#XQueryFA > > [5] http://www.w3.org/2001/11/13-RDF-Query-Rules/#TreeHugger > -- > -eric > > office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, > Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, > 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 > JAPAN > +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA > cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) > > (eric@w3.org) > Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than > email address distribution. >
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 09:57:39 UTC