- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 03:09:58 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20040628070958.GB20261@w3.org>
Howard's XSRQL [1] and TimBL's N3QL [2] are good examples of RDF functions that fit into a larger QL. In the XSRQL case, it gives us an opportunity to lean on some already specified and implemented functionality in XQuery that is likely to get very wide deployment. I'm curious about how much re-use we get, Howard. N3QL constrains itself to be a subset of the N3 syntax which can be used for query. This is especially usful if N3 is later adopted as a rules language because we would get to take advantage of the fact that query goals and rule goals are very similar, both in syntax and in semantics. Once we've defined a language that produces some sort of variable bindings, it's pretty easy to define how to use those bindings to construct new graphs. Anybody interested in exploring this with me? [1] http://www.fatdog.com/xsrql.html#Examples [2] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/N3QL -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia) (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Monday, 28 June 2004 03:09:58 UTC