Re: Test cases

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 10:29:39PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> 
> I've just updated the sketch document to include Eric's Disjunction and
> Optional triple test case, Eric, can you check to see if its a reasonable
> representation of what you meant?

It's certainly what I said. The algae code was partially dismantled at
the time so !unbound! should really be NULL. That keeps the same
variable from binding to a non-NULL value if if shows up in another
term.

      +----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+<br/>
      |         n|         d|         e|         f|         g|<br/>

      +----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+<br/>
      |         A|      NULL|      NULL|      NULL|      NULL|<br/>
      |        A2|      NULL|      NULL|      NULL|      NULL|<br/>
      |        A3|        D3|        E3|        F3|      NULL|<br/>
      |        A4|        D4|        E4|        F4|        F4|<br/>
      +----------+----------+----------+----------+----------+<br/>

I'll write up another test case that shows why that matters.

Oh, and I tried hard to come up with a cool interpretation of
"Nexted optional arcs" but I guess it's "Nested".

> http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~swh/TestSketchCases/
> 
> - Steve

-- 
-eric

office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
                        Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
                        5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
                        JAPAN
        +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell:   +1.857.222.5741 (does not work in Asia)

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.