- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:54:47 -0500
- To: Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Farrukh, you asked last week for scribe instructions. I found a couple pointers[1,2] but I think I'll just restate the essentials: Within a day or two of the meeting[3], the scribe should send a record of the meeting for review. Important/essential parts of the meeting record are: - a pointer to the agenda - roll call - decisions and actions; in particular, the decision to approve the minutes of the previous meeting, which provides a handy pointer it's important to record abstentions and objections. It's nice to summarize the discussion to the extent that you can, but noone should have overly high expectations there. If you want to know every word that was said, you have to be there. If there's anything else that's really important to go in the record, the chair should point it out to the scribe explicitly. [1] ADMIN: tips for scribes: clear link to previous minutes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Aug/0230.html [2] Quick and Dirty Minutes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/1998JulSep/0108.html from http://www.w3.org/Guide/#Meetings [3] http://www.w3.org/2004/02/Process-20040205/policies.html#GeneralMeetings hmm... it says actions must be available with 24 hours. I prefer not to have separate actions and minutes. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 14 June 2004 10:54:05 UTC