- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:01:40 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-06-08 14:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/06/08-dawg-irc scribe: JosD Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-01 for review http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0503.html 2. Status of July F2F ACTION: RobS to set up hosting page for F2F in progress http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0523.html ACTION: EricP to set up registration for F2F 3. Publication of Use Cases and Requirements (UC&R) document ACTION: EricP done. woohoo! http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases v1.101 was published as http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20040602/ incoming comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ include one from Klyne. 4. Review requirements, evaluating designs I'd like to take these in uc&r document order. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases#req 1.101 or better -- 3.3 Extensible Value Testing ACTION: EricP evaluate RDQL done: RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 23:23:51 +0900 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0495.html and note Alberto's reply re extensible value testing, and Andy's reply. note also: iTQL evaluation Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:06:00 -0400 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0522.html and Simon's reply how to dispose of "3.3a Extensible Value Testing" variant? -- 3.4 Subgraph Results ACTION: RobS will email to the group a proposed change to cover this. (that 3.4 doesn't cover queries with disjunctions. re 3.4) -- 3.5 Local Queries ACTION: BryanT to draft possible new requirement on independence of protocol and query language. -- 3.6 Optional Match It has been mentioned in several evaluations. straw poll: who is convinced this is a requirement? do we have consensus? -- 3.8 Bookmarkable Queries not sure we're close to a decision here; intend to focus on other items this week. -- 3.9 Bandwidth-efficient Protocol ACTION: SteveH to write his experiences on bandwidth efficiency for querying and email to group. done: Bandwidth efficiency Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:05:17 +0100 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0501.html Result set lantecy Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:37:20 +0100 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0513.html -- 3.10 Result Limits straw poll: who's convinced this is a requirements? are we close to a decision here? -- 4.2 Provenance note SteveH's reply re provenance implementation experience with RDQL -- 4.4 User-specifiable Serialization ACTION: KendellC to elaborate on 4.4 -- 4.6 Additional Semantic Information ACTION: AndyS to revise SeRQL and resend done: SeRQL evaluation Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:13:00 +0100 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0510.html 4. Review test materials (ACTION SteveH) Testcase queries temporarily available at: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~swh/TestSketchCases/ ACTION: SteveH continues doubt we can afford much time for this item this week, but I don't want to drop it. p.s. This agenda is a few hours late. If that inconveniences anybody, please do let me know. I have about 1 hour between the start of my workday and when the agenda is due, and half of it is taken by a meeting. I could try to do agendas on Fridays, but that's harder. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 13:01:17 UTC