Agenda: RDF Data Access WG telcon 8 Jun

1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda

 RDF Data Access Working Group
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
 Tuesday 2004-06-08 14:30 UTC
 Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
 http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
 supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
	log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/06/08-dawg-irc

scribe: JosD

Minutes of RDF DAWG telcon 2004-06-01 for review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0503.html



2. Status of July F2F

ACTION: RobS to set up hosting page for F2F
in progress
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0523.html

ACTION: EricP to set up registration for F2F


3. Publication of Use Cases and Requirements (UC&R) document

ACTION: EricP done. woohoo!

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases v1.101 was
published as http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-rdf-dawg-uc-20040602/

incoming comments http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/
include one from Klyne.


4. Review requirements, evaluating designs

 I'd like to take these in uc&r document order.
 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/UseCases#req
 1.101 or better



-- 3.3 Extensible Value Testing

ACTION: EricP evaluate RDQL
done:
 RDQL functionality vs. DAWG requirements
 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 23:23:51 +0900
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0495.html

and note Alberto's reply re extensible value testing, and Andy's reply.


note also:

 iTQL evaluation
 Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:06:00 -0400
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0522.html

and Simon's reply


how to dispose of "3.3a Extensible Value Testing" variant?


-- 3.4 Subgraph Results
ACTION: RobS will email to the group a proposed change to cover this.
(that 3.4 doesn't cover queries with disjunctions. re 3.4)

-- 3.5 Local Queries

ACTION: BryanT to draft possible new requirement on independence of
protocol and query language.


-- 3.6 Optional Match

It has been mentioned in several evaluations.
straw poll: who is convinced this is a requirement?
do we have consensus?


-- 3.8 Bookmarkable Queries

not sure we're close to a decision here; intend to focus on other
items this week.

-- 3.9 Bandwidth-efficient Protocol
ACTION: SteveH to write his experiences on bandwidth efficiency for
querying and email to group.
done:

 Bandwidth efficiency
 Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:05:17 +0100
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0501.html

 Result set lantecy
 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:37:20 +0100
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0513.html


-- 3.10 Result Limits

straw poll: who's convinced this is a requirements? are we close
to a decision here?


-- 4.2 Provenance

note SteveH's reply re provenance implementation experience with RDQL


-- 4.4 User-specifiable Serialization

ACTION: KendellC to elaborate on 4.4  


-- 4.6 Additional Semantic Information

ACTION: AndyS to revise SeRQL and resend
done:
 SeRQL evaluation
 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 15:13:00 +0100 
 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0510.html


4. Review test materials (ACTION SteveH)

Testcase queries temporarily available at:
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~swh/TestSketchCases/
ACTION: SteveH continues

doubt we can afford much time for this item this week,
but I don't want to drop it.


p.s. This agenda is a few hours late. If that inconveniences
anybody, please do let me know. I have about 1 hour between
the start of my workday and when the agenda is due, and half
of it is taken by a meeting. I could try to do agendas
on Fridays, but that's harder.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 7 June 2004 13:01:17 UTC