- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:46:19 +0100
- To: "'Rob Shearer'" <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>, <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
-------- Original Message -------- > From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <> > Date: 17 May 2004 20:05 > > The proposed rewording of my proposed rewording seems to be > nothing but a removal of the reference to SWRL. I included > that language in the list quite intentionally--I felt it was > important to include a language that can be used to describe > RDF models but does NOT necessarily have any RDF encoding. > > Why are we working so hard to make sure not to mention SWRL? Minor, but SWRL is a proposal, not a W3C recommendation or output from a standards body. The final rules langauage for the (semantic) web will probably have a different name to distinuish from the SWRL work. Andy > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kendall Clark [mailto:kendall@monkeyfist.com] > > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 11:10 AM > > To: Rob Shearer > > Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > > Subject: I can accept... (Was: Re: Objective 4.6: additional semantic > > knowledge) > > > > > > On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:52:52PM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote: > > > > > 4.6 Additional semantic knowledge > > > It should be possible for knowledge encoded in other semantic > > > languages, such as RDFS, OWL, and SWRL to affect the results of > > > queries about RDF graphs. > > > > In the interests of making progress, I'm willing to accept Rob's > > version, above, of my original proposal. In the current UC&R doc, my > > original is 4.6 and Rob's variant is 4.6a. > > > > So, I'd be willing to accept a modest reworking of 4.6a: > > > > Additional Semantic Information > > > > It should be possible for knowledged encode din other semantic > > languages -- for example: RDFS, OWL, etc. -- to affect the results of > > queries about RDF graphs. > > > > In fact, unless someone objects, I'd like to make that the language in > > the document and the version which we vote on at some point. > > > > Best, > > Kendall Clark
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 15:46:43 UTC