- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 20:38:27 +0100
- To: <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: "'RDF Data Access Working Group'" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
It kind of falls out of using HTTP/MIME-type negotiation. In the SOAP/POST world, I'm not sure what it would mean. There is only one serialization (RDF/XML); the rest have "lesser standing". For small devices n-triples might be helpful but if the device is so small it doesn't like XML, there is limit to what it's going to do anyway. Andy -------- Original Message -------- > From: Kendall Clark <mailto:kendall@monkeyfist.com> > Date: 17 May 2004 20:21 > > On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 04:12:53PM +0100, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > > 4.4 User-specifiable Serialization > > > > If this is saying RDF/XML vs application/N3 or whatever, it doesn't > > seem to be very strong. > > That's what I meant. What do you mean by "doesn't seem to be > very strong". I agree that it isn't *hard*, but it's one of > those niggling details, IMO, that is useful to standardize. > > Kendall
Received on Monday, 17 May 2004 15:38:51 UTC