- From: Farrukh Najmi <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 18:36:57 -0400
- To: kendall@monkeyfist.com
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Kendall Clark wrote: >On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:35:09PM -0400, Farrukh Najmi wrote: > > > >>+1 on keeping federated query support out-of-scope. IMO, our focus should >>be on one querying one RDF repository. >> >> > >I didn't propose federated query. I proposed multi*graph* (which may >very well be *local*) query. (The two readings of my requirement are >about the semantics of the query (query then union, union then query) >rather than about where the graphs are or were or something...) > >Consider a TriX file that contains a graphset which contains multiple >graph serializations. I'd like to be able to query *some* of them (say >the ones that hold metadata about the other graphs, or the ones that >are from Joe, not Lisa, etc) rather than all or none of them. > > Apologies for the misunderstanding. I now understand the distinction and retract my concern. -- Regards, Farrukh
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 18:49:25 UTC