Re: requirement: multigraph query

Kendall Clark wrote:

>On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:35:09PM -0400, Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>
>  
>
>>+1 on keeping federated query support out-of-scope. IMO, our focus should
>>be on one querying one RDF repository.
>>    
>>
>
>I didn't propose federated query. I proposed multi*graph* (which may
>very well be *local*) query. (The two readings of my requirement are
>about the semantics of the query (query then union, union then query)
>rather than about where the graphs are or were or something...)
>
>Consider a TriX file that contains a graphset which contains multiple
>graph serializations. I'd like to be able to query *some* of them (say
>the ones that hold metadata about the other graphs, or the ones that
>are from Joe, not Lisa, etc) rather than all or none of them.
>  
>
Apologies for the misunderstanding.
I now understand the distinction and retract my concern.

-- 
Regards,
Farrukh

Received on Thursday, 6 May 2004 18:49:25 UTC