- From: Rob Shearer <Rob.Shearer@networkinference.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:56:46 -0700
- To: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Andreas Eberhart has posted a message to the rdf-logic list (in fact, attempted to cross-post it to just about every RDF-related list) which I feel is somewhat counter-productive to the work of this group: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-logic/2004Apr/0063.html I'm not sure what the consensus view on this kind of stuff is. I think the last thing we want is for other RDF groups to be arguing about what a query language should be under the assumption that we're hearing their input when we're clearly not (the attempted cross-post to our mailing list didn't seem to go through). I'm also a bit irked about surveys that don't include the REX language; I realize I haven't put together enough resources to make it accessible (hoping to at least post a summary of the f2f presentation this weekend), but I really don't have the time to be writing comprehensive documentation and language tutorials in more than one forum.
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:58:08 UTC