- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:56:27 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Rob Shearer wrote: > I'm not sure what the consensus view on this kind of stuff is. I think > the last thing we want is for other RDF groups to be arguing about what > a query language should be under the assumption that we're hearing their > input when we're clearly not (the attempted cross-post to our mailing > list didn't seem to go through). Just to add another data point, I'm finding this report extremely useful, both in editing our UC&R doc and as a member of the WG thinking about where to start, what other tech requirements to propose, and so on. > I'm also a bit irked about surveys that don't include the REX language; > I realize I haven't put together enough resources to make it accessible > (hoping to at least post a summary of the f2f presentation this > weekend), but I really don't have the time to be writing comprehensive > documentation and language tutorials in more than one forum. Is there anything about REX on the Web? Best, Kendall Clark
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 14:58:56 UTC