- From: Andreas Eberhart <aeb@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 18:16:09 +0200
- To: <daml-all@daml.org>, <ontoweb-list@www1-c703.uibk.ac.at>, <ontoweb-language-sig@cs.man.ac.uk>, <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>, <seweb-list@www1-c703.uibk.ac.at>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, <www-rdf-logic@w3.org>, <www-rdf-rules@w3.org>
- Cc: "Raphael Volz" <raphael@volz.info>, <pha@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>, <jbroeks@cs.vu.nl>
Related to the recent work of the RDF Data Access Working Group [1], we have compared six proposals for RDF query languages. The report, the use case data, and the queries are available online [2]. Looking forward to hearing your feedback. Peter Haase, Andreas Eberhart, Raphael Volz, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe Jeen Broekstra, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/pha/rdf-query/
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 12:19:44 UTC