- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:47:16 -0700
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
In errata-query-8 there is
The definition of Substitute [sic] should exclude varaibles [sic] not
visible at the outermost level of the graph pattern.
and also
That is, a variable used inside a nested SELECT that is not in it's [sic]
projection, should be considered a different variable.
These two are not equivalent, as is shown by the example there
SELECT ?s WHERE {
?s :p ?value .
FILTER EXISTS {
?s :p ?count
{
SELECT (COUNT(*) AS ?count) WHERE {
?s :p ?other # Hidden by projection ?s : should be same-as
?anything.
}
}
}
}
In this example, ?s is visible at the outermost level of the graph pattern,
but is not in the projection of the inner query.
Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Nuance Communications
Received on Monday, 27 June 2016 13:48:08 UTC