- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 06:47:16 -0700
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
In errata-query-8 there is The definition of Substitute [sic] should exclude varaibles [sic] not visible at the outermost level of the graph pattern. and also That is, a variable used inside a nested SELECT that is not in it's [sic] projection, should be considered a different variable. These two are not equivalent, as is shown by the example there SELECT ?s WHERE { ?s :p ?value . FILTER EXISTS { ?s :p ?count { SELECT (COUNT(*) AS ?count) WHERE { ?s :p ?other # Hidden by projection ?s : should be same-as ?anything. } } } } In this example, ?s is visible at the outermost level of the graph pattern, but is not in the projection of the inner query. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Nuance Communications
Received on Monday, 27 June 2016 13:48:08 UTC