- From: james anderson <james@dydra.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 11:44:44 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Cc: tech@dydra.com
good afternoon; as we continue to work through the sparql test suites, we observe that numerous result documents are encoded with an rdf schema specific to the dawg sparql suite. the structure follows no sparql 1.1 recommendation, and its description appears just as a reference[1] in the “sparql 1.1: test case structure” document.[2] does this document form provide any advantage over the recommended ones for the purpose of regression tests? is there any reason not to replace those documents with ones which use some recommended result schema? best regards, from berlin, — [1] : http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/result-set.n3 [2] : http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/ --- james anderson | james@dydra.com | http://dydra.com
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2015 11:45:15 UTC