- From: Andy Seaborne <andy@apache.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 18:05:10 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <567990D6.8000205@apache.org>
As it's a legal extension point, you can't completely ignore
implementations.
You can talk about "an implementation with no extensions", in which case
there will be zero results.
Andy
On 20/12/15 14:11, 韩兴旺 wrote:
> Hi:
> I want to be sure that , according to SPARQL 1.1 specificition,
> (do not consider the implementations ), this query SELECT * WHERE {?s
> ?p ?o filter(isBlank(?s)) filter(str(?s) = 'nodeID://b10001') } limit
> 10 must return empty solution(Because the domain of function STR do
> not contain BlankNode)? And for more examples if filter condition is
> Regex(?x, '^a'); and if the mapping solution of ?x must be a Literal
> or it can be a BlankNode or URI?
> Wish your reply!
> Your Sincerely
> Xingwang Han
>
>
> Hi there,
>
> If you ask for JSON or XML results, you'll see that ?s is returned as
> a bnode so some of this is the presentation of bNodes in the HTML.
> (The TSV format is broken.)
>
> Implementations may add something in any place where the signature
> does not cover the case, here, STR on a blank node. It means that a
> filter may pass more solutions than the basic standard, but not less
> (well, that was the design in SPARQL 1.0 - it's not so simple in
> SPARQL 1.1).
>
> Your question is specific to the engine implementation at
> http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql
> so you might get a more detailed answer there or in its documentation.
>
> Andy
>
> On 19/12/15 16:49, wrote:
> Hi, All :
> Now, I have a question. Can you help me?
>
> In sparql 1.1 I find the definition of function str() is that:
>
>
> 17.4.2.5 str
>
> simple literal STR (literal ltrl) simple literal STR (IRI rsrc)
>
> But when I search the query SELECT * WHERE {?s ?p ?o
> filter(isBlank(?s)) filter(str(?s) = 'nodeID://b10001') } limit 10 ,
> I think if isBlank(?s)is true, then function str(?s)will not be
> executed. Because the domin of str do not contain Blank node.
> I think I will got the empty solution. But when I search this
> query on the endpoint of *LOD Cloud Cache
> <http://lod.openlinksw.com/>* on the web site
> http://lod.openlinksw.com/sparql/,
> I got the result like the following:
> s p o
> nodeID://b10001 http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type
> http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class
> nodeID://b10001 http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#complementOf
> http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Nothing
>
>
>
> I fell it is odd, and I want to know why it is so!
> Thank you very much.
> Your Best Xingwang
> Wish your reply.
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 December 2015 18:05:53 UTC