W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Further comment on SPARQL 1.1 Test Cases

From: Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 06:22:29 +0200
Message-Id: <3E929CFC-3E0E-421E-A8AA-E2B5683DEFD7@polleres.net>
To: public-rdf-dawg-comments Comments <public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org>, rvesse@dotnetrdf.org
Hi Rob,

This is a joint response to




First of all, thanks for your concrete editorial suggestions! We have implemented them as follows:

1) We have adapted your editorial suggestion in Update:

Variables in QuadDatas are disallowed in INSERT DATA requests
(see Note 8 in the grammar). That is, the INSERT DATA statement
only allows to insert ground triples. Blank nodes in QuadData
are assumed to be disjoint from the blank nodes in the Graph Store,
i.e., will be inserted with "fresh"  blank nodes.

2) We have edited Note 10. in the Grammar


and collected all issues about blank node usage in update and query requests in one place in section



Please note that the further text you proposes, namely

"users should note that distinct fresh blank nodes will be generated for each usage in each block."

disagrees with what we had discussed in thread [1], that is, shared blank nodes across QuadPatterns within the same INSERT DATA operation are allowed and behave similar as in test case http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/manifest#insert-05a. The group is currently discussing adding more test cases making the intended behavior more explicit.

We hope this answers your concerns and would appreciate a response to the list acknowledging this.

Thanks, Axel, on behalf of the SPARQL WG.

1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0163.html
Received on Saturday, 6 October 2012 04:22:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:31 UTC