- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:17:12 -0400
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Sorry for this late comment, but I just set out to make use of the SPARQL 1.1 Service Description vocabulary, and I realized that I do not see a machine processable version (n3 or RDF/XML) in the specification. Is there one that I missed? If not, please provide either a normative or non-normative version with the specification. The spec defines a formal vocabulary; it would be most unfortunate if an n3 or RDF/XML version were not included. Thanks! -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 25 August 2011 16:17:46 UTC