Re: Permit LOAD from a SPARQL CONSTRUCT endpoint

Thanks, that sounds fine to me.

David

On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:47 +0000, Alexandre Passant wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Sorry for the delayed answer
> 
> On 15 Oct 2010, at 16:37, David Booth wrote:
> 
> > Sec 3.1.7 talks about reading triples from a *document*:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#t417 
> > But surely a SPARQL endpoint could be used instead, using a URI that
> > encodes a CONSTRUCT query.  Right?
> 
> Indeed, that URI could be a reference to a query sent to a SPARQL endpoint, as soon as it provides a set of statements that can be parsed and loaded into the store (e.g. CONSTRUCT)
> 
> > 
> > It would be good to clarify section 3.1.7 to indicate that this is
> > permissible.
> > 
> 
> It will be rephrased in the next iteration:
> 
> "The documentURI specifies the URI of a document such that a store will be able to identify, locate and read the document. Common forms will be URLs with the http or file protocols. This URI could be a reference to a query sent to a SPARQL endpoint, as soon as it provides a set of statements that can be parsed and loaded into the store (e.g. CONSTRUCT)"
> 
> We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex. 
> on behalf of the SPARQL working group
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > David Booth, Ph.D.
> > Cleveland Clinic (contractor)
> > http://dbooth.org/
> > 
> > Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
> > reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.
> > 
> > 
> 
> --
> Dr. Alexandre Passant
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Galway
> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
David Booth, Ph.D.
Cleveland Clinic (contractor)
http://dbooth.org/

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect those of Cleveland Clinic.

Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 15:20:01 UTC