- From: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:47:30 +0000
- To: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Hi David, Sorry for the delayed answer On 15 Oct 2010, at 16:37, David Booth wrote: > Sec 3.1.7 talks about reading triples from a *document*: > http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#t417 > But surely a SPARQL endpoint could be used instead, using a URI that > encodes a CONSTRUCT query. Right? Indeed, that URI could be a reference to a query sent to a SPARQL endpoint, as soon as it provides a set of statements that can be parsed and loaded into the store (e.g. CONSTRUCT) > > It would be good to clarify section 3.1.7 to indicate that this is > permissible. > It will be rephrased in the next iteration: "The documentURI specifies the URI of a document such that a store will be able to identify, locate and read the document. Common forms will be URLs with the http or file protocols. This URI could be a reference to a query sent to a SPARQL endpoint, as soon as it provides a set of statements that can be parsed and loaded into the store (e.g. CONSTRUCT)" We would be grateful if you would acknowledge that your comment has been answered by sending a reply to this mailing list. Thanks, Alex. on behalf of the SPARQL working group > > > -- > David Booth, Ph.D. > Cleveland Clinic (contractor) > http://dbooth.org/ > > Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily > reflect those of Cleveland Clinic. > > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant Digital Enterprise Research Institute National University of Ireland, Galway :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 12:48:05 UTC