- From: Benjamin Nowack <bnowack@semsol.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 18:47:52 +0200
- To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Heyup, I started running the tests and noticed some (bad syntax) tests which ARC correctly complains about, but partly for other reasons than expected by the test: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/syntax-sparql3/syn-bad-26.rq => the group graph pattern is not closed, but test is for expression http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/syntax-sparql3/syn-blabel-cro ss-optional-bad.rq http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/syntax-sparql3/syn-blabel-cro ss-union-bad.rq => undefined prefix "foaf", but test is for bnode label re-use across patterns http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/syntax-sparql4/syn-bad-UNION- breaks-BGP.rq => invalid triple object "v2", but test is for bnode label re-use across patterns The test suite is just great, BTW. Helped me spot at least 10 bugs in my parser. Cheers, Benjamin -- Benjamin Nowack bnowack[at]semsol.com semsol web semantics Bielefelder Str. 5 40468 Duesseldorf, Germany fon: +49.211.7316824 fax: +49.211.1587107 http://semsol.com/
Received on Monday, 3 September 2007 16:48:58 UTC