- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:39:43 +0100
- To: Simon Gibbs <simon.gibbs@cantorva.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Simon Gibbs wrote: > > 2.8.2 "Note that both the triple patterns involving foaf:nick will > need to match, not that one of the other should match." > should read "one or the other". Fixed > > Sections 2.7 and 2.8.3, compare the TOC and the document. The section > headings are clearly inverted in one or the other place. I'm not sure which. Fixed: 2.7 Blank Nodes in Query Results 2.8.3 Blank Nodes in Queries > Section 2.7 "There is no relation between using _:a in the results and > any blank node label in the data graph." > > No blank node labelled "a" appears in the example result sets. Perhaps > instead, > > "There is no relation between labels in the data graph and labels in the > results. a, b, c, d, r, and s are all examples of valid labels for any > of _:a or _:b in the graph shown." Text changed to: """ There would be no relation if the label _:a were used in the results and the blank node label in the data graph. """ > > I did say trivial :-) No problem :-) Andy > > SJG
Received on Thursday, 1 June 2006 09:39:58 UTC