Re: SPARQL CR erratum

Richard Newman wrote:
> 2.8.4 is repeated -- rdf:type should instead be labelled (according  
> to the TOC) as 2.8.5.

Fixed in the editors' draft
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/

	Thanks
	Andy

Received on Thursday, 1 June 2006 09:39:46 UTC