- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:36:37 +0100
- To: Olivier Corby <Olivier.Corby@sophia.inria.fr>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Olivier Corby wrote:
> I have a remark concerning the GRAPH statement when there is another
> GRAPH within its scope. For example :
>
> PREFIX foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/>
> SELECT ?src ?bobNick
> WHERE
> {
> GRAPH ?src
> { ?x foaf:mbox <mailto:bob@work.example> .
> GRAPH ?src2 {
> ?x foaf:nick ?bobNick
> }
> }
> }
>
> One may understand that the internal GRAPH ?src2 can match any named
> graph, possibly different from the one that is matched by the outer
> GRAPH ?src.
> If this is the case, the text in section 8.1 Accessing Graph Labels
> at http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#accessByLabel is ambiguous :
>
> "The pattern part of the GRAPH only matched triples in a single named
> graph ..."
>
> The 8.5 Definition for GRAPH is also ambiguous for the same reason.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Olivier Corby
>
Oliver,
Thanks for noting that. I have cleared it up as part of a change that defines
matching a pattern on a dataset. I have removed the text "The pattern part..."
and the definition of matching GRAPH has been moved earlier.
Andy
==== Definition: RDF Dataset
An RDF dataset is a set:
{ G, (<u1>, G1), (<u2>, G2), . . . (<un>, Gn) }
where G and each Gi are graphs, and each <ui> is an IRI. Each <ui> is distinct.
G is called the default graph. (<u1>, Gi) are called named graphs.
There may be no named graphs.
A graph pattern P, where P is not an RDF Dataset Graph Pattern, matches an RDF
dataset DS with solution S if P matches G (the default graph of DS) with solution S.
==== Definition: RDF Dataset Graph Pattern
If D is a dataset {G, (<u1> G1), ...}, and P is a graph pattern then S is a
pattern solution of GRAPH(g, P) if either of:
1. g is an IRI where g = <ui> for some i, and S is pattern solution of P on
dataset {Gi, (<u1> G1), ...}
2. g is a variable, S maps the variable g to <ui> and S is a pattern
solution of P on {Gi, (<u1> G1), ...}
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 15:40:44 UTC