- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 04:10:34 +0200
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
* Dan Connolly wrote: >> If the IRI above is intended to be the namespace name >> for use in the Candidate Recommendation of the format, please change >> it to something sensible; > >In what way is it not sensible? Well, it's inconsistent with >> common W3C namespace names are >> >> * http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml >> * http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink >> * http://www.w3.org/2000/svg >> * http://www.w3.org/2001/vxml >> * http://www.w3.org/2001/xml-events >> * http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms >> * http://www.w3.org/2004/xbl >> * ... common W3C practise and depends on authors, developers (think XSLT authors or JavaScript developers processing AJAX Sparql results) doing more work (remember more complicated names, typing more), I don't think any harm would be done if it is changed to http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql http://www.w3.org/2005/sparql-results or something along those lines. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 22 July 2005 02:10:45 UTC