W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org > December 2005

[OK?] Re: [comments] Note about WSDL2 Binding

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:04:18 -0500
Message-Id: <FCF83456-2BC9-4F35-8049-242D1ECDADE8@monkeyfist.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>

On Oct 11, 2005, at 10:05 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:

> SPARQL Protocol for RDF
> W3C Working Draft 14 September 2005
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-rdf-sparql-protocol-20050914/
> The explanation here is far to be satisfying. I would dedicate a  
> section to it and not relate on an email thread.

In the latest editor's draft (http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ 
proto-wd/) that section has been removed. Does that address your  

(Note: it's been removed because WS-Desc has reworked enough of WSDL  
that DAWG's preferred design is no longer illegal. While DAWG's WSDL  
hasn't yet been corrected in the latest editor's draft, it will be in  
the next few days.)

Received on Thursday, 29 December 2005 19:17:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:22 UTC