- From: Richard Newman <r.newman@reading.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:01:29 -0800
- To: andy.seaborne@hp.com
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
Andy, I'm happy for this issue to be closed for the current version of SPARQL. It might be good to revisit this issue in the future, though. Thanks, -Richard On 21 Dec 2005, at 03:39, Seaborne, Andy wrote: > > The working group has considered this comment but in the end it > decided to leave "CONSTRUCT *" out of this version of SPARQL. > > -------- > PROPOSED: to leave out CONSTRUCT *, as the cost of delaying the > SPARQL spec to work out the design details, and the risk of > conflict with rules designs, outweighs the convenience of adding it > ACCEPTED > -------- > > There is some discussion from > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/ > 0266.html > > Addressing some restricted, simple cases, and not others, didn't > motivate the working group members, given that a quick, restricted > design may block later designs as well as have potential > interactions with rules. > > Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment. > > If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the > subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping. > > Andy
Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 23:58:22 UTC