Re: CONSTRUCT: allow *? [CLOSED]

Andy,
   I'm happy for this issue to be closed for the current version of  
SPARQL. It might be good to revisit this issue in the future, though.

   Thanks,
-Richard

On 21 Dec 2005, at 03:39, Seaborne, Andy wrote:

>
> The working group has considered this comment but in the end it  
> decided to leave "CONSTRUCT *" out of this version of SPARQL.
>
> --------
> PROPOSED: to leave out CONSTRUCT *, as the cost of delaying the  
> SPARQL spec to work out the design details, and the risk of  
> conflict with rules designs, outweighs the convenience of adding it
> ACCEPTED
> --------
>
> There is some discussion from
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005OctDec/ 
> 0266.html
>
> Addressing some restricted, simple cases, and not others, didn't  
> motivate the working group members, given that a quick, restricted  
> design may block later designs as well as have potential  
> interactions with rules.
>
> Please let us know whether this reply addresses your comment.
>
> If you could additionally send a message with [closed] in the
> subject line, it would save us a little bit of bookkeeping.
>
> 	Andy

Received on Friday, 23 December 2005 23:58:22 UTC