- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 11:31:54 -0600
- To: "Miles, AJ (Alistair)" <A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 14:32 +0000, Miles, AJ (Alistair) wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm not up-to-date with recent dawg developments, just posting this work here in case it's relevant to current discussion ... > > A little while ago I wrote up an idea to use SPARQL queries to generate test reports for RDF graphs, an idea that is analagous to the use of schematron for XML instances, and did a test implementation [1]. Based on this work, I've written up some 'test cases' specifically relating to the use of SKOS Core [2]. This looks nifty; thanks for reporting your experience. You might point to it from http://esw.w3.org/topic/DawgShows and/or http://esw.w3.org/topic/SparqlImplementations . Or I might, or somebody else might; it's world-writeable. Just to be sure... your experience doesn't suggest any changes to the SPARQL design, does it? > Cheers, > > Alistair. > > [1] http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/schemarama/ > [2] http://isegserv.itd.rl.ac.uk/cvs-public/~checkout~/skos/drafts/integrity.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 12 December 2005 17:33:04 UTC