- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:36:16 +0200
- To: Tom Adams <tom@tucanatech.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org
* Tom Adams wrote: >I assume from the comments in your message, that you are talking about >performing an aggregate function on the results of a query? I am not sure what the right terminology here is which is why I gave examples to clarify my comment; from http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/pha/rdf-query/#aggr I understand that Notation3 is considered to support "Aggregation", the example http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/WBS/pha/rdf-query/queries/n3/Counting.n3 however uses cwm's math:memberCount built-in, which, as far as I understand, only works for DAML list constructs, i.e., it won't work with my FOAF example. So if the scope of aggregate functions in this context would be limited to what math:memberCount does, then no. The examples you cite look however more promising, so I think it should be safe to call it like that. >Please review the notes from the 15 July 2004 teleconference for more >details on the group's current thinking, a link will be posted to >public-rdf-dawg when they become available. I assume you mean 15 June 2004 :-) Thanks for the pointer, I'll have a look at it. Thank you for your time, Tom!
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 22:37:00 UTC