- From: Wouter Beek <wouter@triply.cc>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:02:56 +0200
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-comments Comments <public-rdf-comments@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Hi Dan, others, On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > It would be good to have some testcases annotated as being unchanged, > previously-ok-now-illegal, previously-illegal-now-ok, etc. In addition to more test cases, it would also be nice if the status of some of the existing test cases could be further clarified. For example, the test case that checks for parser conformance in case there are no whitespaces between the subject, predicate and object term of an N-Triple was of type `rdft:Proposed', which means "a test is proposed, but not approved." The "proposed" status may be a reason why some state-of-the-art parser do not pass this test. --- Best regards, Wouter Beek. Email: wouter@triply.cc WWW: http://triply.cc Tel: +31647674624
Received on Friday, 30 June 2017 07:52:31 UTC