Re: chelona_trig_earl.ttl report file asserting the successful processing of the http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-testcases by the Cheló̱na Trig Parser

Ruben,

in general we do not have such registry. Note that it is not only a matter of RDF but of W3C specifications in general. Because, at the moment, such registries are managed by persons, it creates a bottleneck that we cannot properly manage.

We could, of course, invent a wiki-like system to get this done through some community cooperation but, at this moment, I do not think any of us have the time for something like that… Nevertheless, I will raise to one of our internal meetings.

Thanks

Ivan


> On 12 Jun 2015, at 08:01 , Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ivan and Sandro,
> 
> As per Gregg's suggestion, I'm including you in the loop.
> 
> The discussion is whether there's a better way to deal with implementation reports
> for specs like Turtle, TriG, and SPARQL.
> 
> Right now, the version people find is the library status at transition time,
> but not the actually available libraries, which are larger in number.
> It would probably be more helpful for users that the actually compatible libraries are listed,
> as this is the information they need to work with RDF-related technologies.
> 
> What do you think?
> Would improving this be a possibility?
> 
> Best,
> 
> Ruben
> 
> On 12 Jun 2015, at 07:56, Gregg Kellogg <gregg@greggkellogg.net> wrote:
> 
>>>> note that the permanent location used as evidence for the transition report is frozen.
>>> 
>>> Would there be any way to change this?
>>> It seems much more useful for potential users (and the general image of the specs)
>>> if people see the actual list of supporting implementations,
>>> rather than a list that reflected the state of implementation over a year ago.
>>> Who can we ask for this?
>> 
>> That’s a procedural and policy issue above my pay grade. Perhaps Ivan or Sandro can provide some background and direction.
>> 
>> Perhaps what is needed is a better way of recording the living status of implementations of W3C specifications, rather than simply recording the evidence for transition. I’d like to have my own SPARQL results available as well along side that of other implementations, for example.
>> 
>> Gregg
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C
Digital Publishing Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704