W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > November 2013

Re: Please remove HTML5 as a normative reference for Turtle 2013

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:13:48 -0400
To: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
Cc: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20131102211347.GA13691@w3.org>
* Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> [2013-02-22 17:22+0100]
> Dave Beckett wrote:
> >http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#in-html
> >is non-normative and the only place that refers to HTML5.  So the reference
> >should be informative.
> >
> >Turtle should NOT depend on understanding HTML5 !
> >
> >Dave
> About the references.. I noticed another thing. The reference [RDF-CONCEPTS] links to the 2004 spec. But under http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#sec-parsing where it is linked there's a direct link to the current WD.
> Which version is the spec supposed to depend on then? That would have an influence on how to resolve the point I raised in my earlier email about language-tagged strings.

ReSpec already knew about RFD11-CONCEPTS, I just had to add the "11".
Thanks for pointing this out. I think this issue is resolved. If you
agree, please reply with the subject prefixed by "[RESOLVED]".

> I hope it will depend on the current RDF spec and just get withheld until that is made a recommendation.

That's pretty much the plan. (The process actually allows Turtle to
lead RDF11-CONCEPTS a little bit.)

> Regards,
>   Simon


office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +

Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.
Received on Saturday, 2 November 2013 21:14:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:59:43 UTC