- From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
- Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 01:33:38 +0100
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi, Thanks for addressing the points. Resolved! Regards, Simon Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> [2013-02-22 17:22+0100] > > Dave Beckett wrote: > > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#in-html > > >is non-normative and the only place that refers to HTML5. So the reference > > >should be informative. > > > > > >Turtle should NOT depend on understanding HTML5 ! > > > > > >Dave > > > > > > About the references.. I noticed another thing. The reference [RDF-CONCEPTS] links to the 2004 spec. But under http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#sec-parsing where it is linked there's a direct link to the current WD. > > > > Which version is the spec supposed to depend on then? That would have an influence on how to resolve the point I raised in my earlier email about language-tagged strings. > > ReSpec already knew about RFD11-CONCEPTS, I just had to add the "11". > Thanks for pointing this out. I think this issue is resolved. If you > agree, please reply with the subject prefixed by "[RESOLVED]". > > > > I hope it will depend on the current RDF spec and just get withheld until that is made a recommendation. > > That's pretty much the plan. (The process actually allows Turtle to > lead RDF11-CONCEPTS a little bit.) > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > >
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 00:33:57 UTC