W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > November 2013

[RESOLVED] Re: Please remove HTML5 as a normative reference for Turtle 2013

From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 01:33:38 +0100
Message-ID: <527599E2.50600@koeln.de>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Hi,

Thanks for addressing the points. Resolved!

Regards,
Simon

Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> [2013-02-22 17:22+0100]
> > Dave Beckett wrote:
> > >http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#in-html
> > >is non-normative and the only place that refers to HTML5.  So the reference
> > >should be informative.
> > >
> > >Turtle should NOT depend on understanding HTML5 !
> > >
> > >Dave
> >
> >
> > About the references.. I noticed another thing. The reference [RDF-CONCEPTS] links to the 2004 spec. But under http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#sec-parsing where it is linked there's a direct link to the current WD.
> >
> > Which version is the spec supposed to depend on then? That would have an influence on how to resolve the point I raised in my earlier email about language-tagged strings.
>
> ReSpec already knew about RFD11-CONCEPTS, I just had to add the "11".
> Thanks for pointing this out. I think this issue is resolved. If you
> agree, please reply with the subject prefixed by "[RESOLVED]".
>
>
> > I hope it will depend on the current RDF spec and just get withheld until that is made a recommendation.
>
> That's pretty much the plan. (The process actually allows Turtle to
> lead RDF11-CONCEPTS a little bit.)
>
>
> > Regards,
> >   Simon
> >
>
Received on Sunday, 3 November 2013 00:33:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:58 UTC