W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > July 2013

Re: Please add conformance tests for Turtle CR

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 11:37:08 -0400
To: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Cc: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130703153707.GF25039@w3.org>
* Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-02-19 22:39-0800]
> Those files seem to be partially ASF licensed e.g.
> 
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/manifest.ttl
> 
> which is possibly a mistake.  Should be W3C software I guess
> although I'd have thought it would just be regular W3C copyright.
> 
> The LICENSE also mis-spells Turtle :)
> 
> I guess if this email is considered another comment that the WG wants to
> respond to, my request is to license this in a way that's easy for all
> software to include this test suite.  ASF is just one track.

<http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/LICENSE> releases the tests under
W3C Test Suite License and W3C 3-clause BSD License. The LICENSE is
distribute in the tarball and zip file.

If this resolution addresses your issue, please respond to this
message with a subject line which starts with "[RESOLVED]". Thank you
for your help in improving the Turtle specification.


> Thanks
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> On 2/19/13 7:56 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> > Hi Dave,
> > 
> > For reference, when I updated the Sesame parser to the previous draft
> > (not 20130219), I used the tests from:
> > 
> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl
> > 
> > These are different to the tests from the original submission which are now at:
> > 
> > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-submission
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Peter
> > 
> > On 20 February 2013 13:49, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> wrote:
> >> Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#conformance
> >>
> >> The conformance tests have been removed compared to the submission doc.  As
> >> an implementer, I found that very useful to develop and machine check
> >> correctness.
> >>
> >> I would request that the tests for conformance be restored and updated to
> >> match the changes in this turtle language over the 2008 version.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> > 
> 
> 

-- 
-ericP
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 15:37:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:57 UTC