W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > July 2013

[RESOLVED] Re: Please add conformance tests for Turtle CR

From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 09:03:21 +1000
Message-ID: <CAGYFOCREXnUGvmgBgkAQ_47H0pqp2z2_1dmduxOx+fatMGOnZQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Cc: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 4 July 2013 01:37, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote:

> * Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-02-19 22:39-0800]
> > Those files seem to be partially ASF licensed e.g.
> >
> >
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/manifest.ttl
> >
> > which is possibly a mistake.  Should be W3C software I guess
> > although I'd have thought it would just be regular W3C copyright.
> >
> > The LICENSE also mis-spells Turtle :)
> >
> > I guess if this email is considered another comment that the WG wants to
> > respond to, my request is to license this in a way that's easy for all
> > software to include this test suite.  ASF is just one track.
>
> <http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/LICENSE> releases the tests under
> W3C Test Suite License and W3C 3-clause BSD License. The LICENSE is
> distribute in the tarball and zip file.
>
> If this resolution addresses your issue, please respond to this
> message with a subject line which starts with "[RESOLVED]". Thank you
> for your help in improving the Turtle specification.
>
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > On 2/19/13 7:56 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > For reference, when I updated the Sesame parser to the previous draft
> > > (not 20130219), I used the tests from:
> > >
> > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl
> > >
> > > These are different to the tests from the original submission which
> are now at:
> > >
> > >
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-submission
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Peter
> > >
> > > On 20 February 2013 13:49, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> wrote:
> > >> Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#conformance
> > >>
> > >> The conformance tests have been removed compared to the submission
> doc.  As
> > >> an implementer, I found that very useful to develop and machine check
> > >> correctness.
> > >>
> > >> I would request that the tests for conformance be restored and
> updated to
> > >> match the changes in this turtle language over the 2008 version.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >>
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
> --
> -ericP
>
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 23:03:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:57 UTC