- From: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 09:03:21 +1000
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>, public-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAGYFOCREXnUGvmgBgkAQ_47H0pqp2z2_1dmduxOx+fatMGOnZQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4 July 2013 01:37, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org> wrote: > * Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-02-19 22:39-0800] > > Those files seem to be partially ASF licensed e.g. > > > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/manifest.ttl > > > > which is possibly a mistake. Should be W3C software I guess > > although I'd have thought it would just be regular W3C copyright. > > > > The LICENSE also mis-spells Turtle :) > > > > I guess if this email is considered another comment that the WG wants to > > respond to, my request is to license this in a way that's easy for all > > software to include this test suite. ASF is just one track. > > <http://www.w3.org/2013/TurtleTests/LICENSE> releases the tests under > W3C Test Suite License and W3C 3-clause BSD License. The LICENSE is > distribute in the tarball and zip file. > > If this resolution addresses your issue, please respond to this > message with a subject line which starts with "[RESOLVED]". Thank you > for your help in improving the Turtle specification. > > > > Thanks > > > > Dave > > > > > > On 2/19/13 7:56 PM, Peter Ansell wrote: > > > Hi Dave, > > > > > > For reference, when I updated the Sesame parser to the previous draft > > > (not 20130219), I used the tests from: > > > > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl > > > > > > These are different to the tests from the original submission which > are now at: > > > > > > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-submission > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Peter > > > > > > On 20 February 2013 13:49, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> wrote: > > >> Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#conformance > > >> > > >> The conformance tests have been removed compared to the submission > doc. As > > >> an implementer, I found that very useful to develop and machine check > > >> correctness. > > >> > > >> I would request that the tests for conformance be restored and > updated to > > >> match the changes in this turtle language over the 2008 version. > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> > > >> Dave > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > -ericP >
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 23:03:48 UTC