W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Please add conformance tests for Turtle CR

From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:39:40 -0800
Message-ID: <51246FAC.6080807@dajobe.org>
To: Peter Ansell <ansell.peter@gmail.com>
CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Those files seem to be partially ASF licensed e.g.

https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl/manifest.ttl

which is possibly a mistake.  Should be W3C software I guess
although I'd have thought it would just be regular W3C copyright.

The LICENSE also mis-spells Turtle :)

I guess if this email is considered another comment that the WG wants to
respond to, my request is to license this in a way that's easy for all
software to include this test suite.  ASF is just one track.

Thanks

Dave


On 2/19/13 7:56 PM, Peter Ansell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> 
> For reference, when I updated the Sesame parser to the previous draft
> (not 20130219), I used the tests from:
> 
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-ttl
> 
> These are different to the tests from the original submission which are now at:
> 
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/file/4d5ebf0ba10f/rdf-turtle/tests-submission
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Peter
> 
> On 20 February 2013 13:49, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> wrote:
>> Re: http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-turtle-20130219/#conformance
>>
>> The conformance tests have been removed compared to the submission doc.  As
>> an implementer, I found that very useful to develop and machine check
>> correctness.
>>
>> I would request that the tests for conformance be restored and updated to
>> match the changes in this turtle language over the 2008 version.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Dave
>>
> 
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 06:40:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:55 UTC