W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > April 2013

[RESOLVED] Re: Turtle tests defining conformance

From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:59:20 -0700
Message-ID: <5162CD38.8050601@dajobe.org>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 3/24/13 8:10 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-03-23 15:38-0700]
>> I reviewed the Turtle 2013 doc and the test suite hanging out in
>> mercurial a few weeks ago at
>>   https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/
>> I'm still not clear if these define conformance; I asked about this
>> in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Feb/0026.html
> 
> In May 2012, the RDF WG discussed conformance and opted to follow
> W3C practice of having the spec alone define conformance.
>   <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-16#line0147>
> (You can track the evolution of the conformance section on
>   <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/log/dad56881f954/rdf-turtle/index.html>.
>  Look for the commit comment "Remove current conformance text".)
> 
> If you are satisfied with the resolution of Turtle tests defining
> conformance, please reply with [RESOLVED] in the subject.
> 
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 13:59:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:55 UTC