- From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:59:20 -0700
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 3/24/13 8:10 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > * Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-03-23 15:38-0700] >> I reviewed the Turtle 2013 doc and the test suite hanging out in >> mercurial a few weeks ago at >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-turtle/ >> I'm still not clear if these define conformance; I asked about this >> in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-comments/2013Feb/0026.html > > In May 2012, the RDF WG discussed conformance and opted to follow > W3C practice of having the spec alone define conformance. > <http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2012-05-16#line0147> > (You can track the evolution of the conformance section on > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/log/dad56881f954/rdf-turtle/index.html>. > Look for the commit comment "Remove current conformance text".) > > If you are satisfied with the resolution of Turtle tests defining > conformance, please reply with [RESOLVED] in the subject. >
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 13:59:51 UTC