W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-comments@w3.org > April 2013

[RESOLVED] Re: Turtle test donations

From: Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 06:58:28 -0700
Message-ID: <5162CD04.1050901@dajobe.org>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
On 3/24/13 7:53 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> * Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org> [2013-03-23 15:38-0700]
>> … [eliding license issues addressed in a separate sub-thread]
>> I've got some tests I made for raptor after the original Turtle submission
>> that the WG might want to use.  I give permission for them to be used
>> under the W3C software license
>> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
>>
>> This is what they test:
> 
>    test-33.ttl - \\ at end of """ 			→ literal_with_REVERSE_SOLIDUS
>    test-35.ttl - what are rules for "foo"@lang^^uri ?	→ turtle-syntax-bad-LITERAL2_with_langtag_and_datatype
>    test-36.ttl - check for greedy lexers		→ two_LITERAL_LONG2s
>    test-37.ttl - long literal with lang tag		→ langtagged_LONG_with_subtag
>    test-38.ttl - unicode surrogates ok or not		moved to separate thread.
> 
>> test-35 is not strictly legal but I had to decide what to do; I dropped
>> the language.
>>
>> zip file attached.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Dave
> 
> Assuming Andy Seaborne has persuaded you that
> "value"@en^^rdf:XMLLiteral is outside the Turtle grammar in
> <http://www.w3.org/mid/514EE086.6000704@epimorphics.com>, I've
> included test-35 as a negative syntax test. test-38 is addressed in
> <http://www.w3.org/mid/20130324145153.GN14139@w3.org>, "surrogates is
> literals". I've incorporated the others with the names shown in the
> right column above.
> 
> If you are satisfied with the resolution of donation of tests 33, 35,
> 36. 37, please reply with [RESOLVED] in the subject.
> 
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 13:58:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:29:55 UTC