- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr>
- Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:41:39 +0200
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: public-rdf-comments@w3.org
Le 05/09/2012 15:58, Richard Cyganiak a écrit : > [...] > > Thanks, not too bad! Here's a slight rewording, does this still sound > ok? > > [[ Note: The Web Ontology Language [OWL2] offers [facilities for > formally defining custom > datatypes](http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Datatype_Definitions) > that can be used with RDF. However, RDF implementations are not > required to support these facilities. ]] Very concise, good for me. -AZ > > Best, Richard > > >> >> >> AZ. >> >> Le 04/09/2012 21:36, Richard Cyganiak a écrit : >>> Ivan, Antoine, Dan, Richard, Jeremy, >>> >>> I guess I like the idea of informatively linking to both the >>> 2006 SWBP Note on datatypes [1] and to the OWL 2 datatype >>> definition mechanism [2], stating that both XML Schema and OWL 2 >>> provide facilities for formally defining RDF datatypes, but that >>> support for neither mechanism is required for RDF. >>> >>> Jeremy: Is [1] still considered up-to-date, or should we avoid >>> drawing attention to it? >>> >>> Antoine, Ivan, Dan: Perhaps one of you wants to take a stab at >>> drafting a sentence that could be inserted into the Datatypes >>> section [3] as another Note? >>> >>> Cheers, Richard >>> >>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-xsch-datatypes/ [2] >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/#Datatype_Definitions [3] >>> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/rdf/raw-file/default/rdf-concepts/index.html#section-Datatypes >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 4 Sep 2012, at 18:38, Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>>> Dan, >>>> >>>> the question is of course justified, but I should also add >>>> that, in fact, very very few people use xmls schema datatype >>>> definitions together with RDF, too. In both cases the >>>> difficulty is identical: to understand and process those >>>> datatypes an external 'tool' has to be brought in: either an >>>> xml schema or an owl processor... Mainly in a non-XML RDF world >>>> (ie, as Richard said, with a diminishing usage of RDF/XML) the >>>> chance of using XML schema based derived datatypes is getting >>>> smaller and smaller in my view. >>>> >>>> I find the OWL 2 datatype definition possibilities one of the >>>> most interesting and potentially important part of OWL 2. I >>>> actually wish the relevant part of the specification was also >>>> made more known and possibly used in isolation; at present it >>>> is burried in the overall OWL 2 spec, which is of course not an >>>> easy read... >>>> >>>> (Maybe it is worth some extra blog/note) >>>> >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> --- Ivan Herman Tel:+31 641044153 http://www.ivan-herman.net >>>> >>>> (Written on mobile, sorry for brevity and misspellings...) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 4 Sep 2012, at 15:37, Dan Brickley<danbri@danbri.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4 September 2012 21:11, Antoine Zimmermann >>>>> <antoine.zimmermann@emse.fr> wrote: >>>>>> FWIW, OWL 2 has a feature to define custom datatypes that >>>>>> can be written completely in RDF, without using XML >>>>>> Schema. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your example for Chapman codes can be written as follows, >>>>>> in Turtle syntax: >>>>>> >>>>>> @prefix geo:<http://www.example.com/geo#> @prefix >>>>>> xsd:<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> @prefix >>>>>> owl:<http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> @prefix >>>>>> rdfs:<http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> >>>>>> >>>>>> geo:chapman-code a rdfs:Datatype; owl:equivalentClass [ >>>>>> a rdfs:Datatype; owl:onDatatype xsd:string; >>>>>> owl:withRestriction ( [xsd:pattern "[a-zA-Z]{3}"] ) ] . >>>>> >>>>> Interesting! Are many of these showing up "in the wild" yet? >>>>> >>>>> Dan >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École >> Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel >> 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 >> Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/ >> > > -- Antoine Zimmermann ISCOD / LSTI - Institut Henri Fayol École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Étienne 158 cours Fauriel 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2 France Tél:+33(0)4 77 42 66 03 Fax:+33(0)4 77 42 66 66 http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2012 14:42:05 UTC