- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:02:24 +0200
- To: Marcelo Arenas <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, "public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
+1 Boris P.S. this means I've to include new TCs for section 4.4 Default Mappings …. ;) On May 18, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Marcelo Arenas wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:52 AM, David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've gone ahead and made a version of the R2RML ED with the proposed >>>> changes. This is of course not yet backed by a WG resolution, so it's all >>>> tentative. Diff here: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/diffs/default-mapping.html >>>> >>> >>> The R2RML diff looks good to me. >>> >>> -David >> >> >
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 16:03:12 UTC