- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:46:39 +0100
- To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Marcelo Arenas <marcelo.arenas1@gmail.com>, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, "public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org WG" <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 21 May 2012, at 17:02, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > P.S. this means I've to include new TCs for section 4.4 Default Mappings …. ;) Well that's easy. The DM test suite, with the no-PK cases marked as SHOULD, can serve as a test suite for R2RML default mapping generators that produces a DM-based default mapping. Best, Richard > > On May 18, 2012, at 11:15 PM, Marcelo Arenas wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:52 AM, David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I've gone ahead and made a version of the R2RML ED with the proposed >>>>> changes. This is of course not yet backed by a WG resolution, so it's all >>>>> tentative. Diff here: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/diffs/default-mapping.html >>>>> >>>> >>>> The R2RML diff looks good to me. >>>> >>>> -David >>> >>> >> > >
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 16:47:34 UTC