Re: Finalizing the duplicate-row-preservation proposal

+1

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:52 AM, David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've gone ahead and made a version of the R2RML ED with the proposed
>>> changes. This is of course not yet backed by a WG resolution, so it's all
>>> tentative. Diff here:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/diffs/default-mapping.html
>>>
>>
>> The R2RML diff looks good to me.
>>
>> -David
>
>

Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 21:15:34 UTC