Re: Finalizing the duplicate-row-preservation proposal

+1

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:52 AM, David McNeil <dmcneil@revelytix.com> wrote:

> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>wrote:
>
>> I've gone ahead and made a version of the R2RML ED with the proposed
>> changes. This is of course not yet backed by a WG resolution, so it's all
>> tentative. Diff here:
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/diffs/default-mapping.html
>>
>>
> The R2RML diff looks good to me.
>
> -David
>

Received on Friday, 18 May 2012 16:13:58 UTC