Re: R2RML doc's Fig 1 needs minor changes?

Boris,

I think what confused me are the diamond symbol at the base of each of the connectors (except the "RefObjectMap -> TriplesMap" edge). Are those just indicating the origin in a directed edge? If so, then we should change the "RefObjectMap -> TriplesMap" edge to use that same diamond notation as well (instead of the arrowhead at the TriplesMap end).

Thanks,
- Souri.

----- Original Message -----
From: bvillazon@fi.upm.es
To: souripriya.das@oracle.com
Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
Sent: Monday, May 7, 2012 10:31:04 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: R2RML doc's Fig 1 needs minor changes?

Hi Souri

As far as I can tell Fig 1 [1] is not showing the cardinalities of the relationships.

Boris

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-r2rml-20120223/#overview

On May 7, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Souripriya Das wrote:

> Please consider following changes for Fig 1 [1]:
> - TriplesMap to LogicaTable is shown as a 1:n relationship: should be changed to 1:1
> - TriplesMap to SubjectMap is shown as as a 1:n relationship: should be changed to 1:1
> 
> Thanks,
> - Souri.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-r2rml-20120223/#overview
>

Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 15:21:46 UTC