Re: R2RML doc's Fig 1 needs minor changes?

Souri

The diamond symbol represents a composition relationship, and the narrow from RefObjectMap to TriplesMap represent a dependency relationship [1]
Anyway, I've updated the image with a other style.


Boris


[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_diagram

On May 7, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Souripriya Das wrote:

> Boris,
> 
> I think what confused me are the diamond symbol at the base of each of the connectors (except the "RefObjectMap -> TriplesMap" edge). Are those just indicating the origin in a directed edge? If so, then we should change the "RefObjectMap -> TriplesMap" edge to use that same diamond notation as well (instead of the arrowhead at the TriplesMap end).
> 
> Thanks,
> - Souri.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: bvillazon@fi.upm.es
> To: souripriya.das@oracle.com
> Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2012 10:31:04 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: R2RML doc's Fig 1 needs minor changes?
> 
> Hi Souri
> 
> As far as I can tell Fig 1 [1] is not showing the cardinalities of the relationships.
> 
> Boris
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-r2rml-20120223/#overview
> 
> On May 7, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Souripriya Das wrote:
> 
>> Please consider following changes for Fig 1 [1]:
>> - TriplesMap to LogicaTable is shown as a 1:n relationship: should be changed to 1:1
>> - TriplesMap to SubjectMap is shown as as a 1:n relationship: should be changed to 1:1
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> - Souri.
>> 
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-r2rml-20120223/#overview
>> 
> 
>