Re: R2RML doc's Fig 1 needs minor changes?

Hi Souri

As far as I can tell Fig 1 [1] is not showing the cardinalities of the relationships.

Boris

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-r2rml-20120223/#overview

On May 7, 2012, at 3:25 PM, Souripriya Das wrote:

> Please consider following changes for Fig 1 [1]:
> - TriplesMap to LogicaTable is shown as a 1:n relationship: should be changed to 1:1
> - TriplesMap to SubjectMap is shown as as a 1:n relationship: should be changed to 1:1
> 
> Thanks,
> - Souri.
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-r2rml-20120223/#overview
> 

Received on Monday, 7 May 2012 14:31:31 UTC