- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 01:52:52 +0000
- To: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Cc: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>, Public-Rdb2rdf-Wg RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 5 Mar 2012, at 23:54, Boris Villazon-Terrazas wrote: > I think you were pointing out this question/issue last telecon. > If I understood you correctly you were asking for a TC like [1]. > Within the R2RML mapping we have a rr:predicateObjectMap with two rr:predicateMaps and only one rr:objectMap > > did I understand correctly your question/issue? > > If it is not the case, we have a non-conforming R2RML TC That TC looks good to me. The R2RML mapping is conforming, and the result is what I'd expect. Richard > > Boris > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/#R2RMLTC0008c >
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 01:53:25 UTC