- From: Boris Villazon-Terrazas <bvillazon@fi.upm.es>
- Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 00:54:39 +0100
- To: Juan Sequeda <juanfederico@gmail.com>
- Cc: Public-Rdb2rdf-Wg RDB2RDF <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 23:55:04 UTC
Hi Juan I think you were pointing out this question/issue last telecon. If I understood you correctly you were asking for a TC like [1]. Within the R2RML mapping we have a rr:predicateObjectMap with two rr:predicateMaps and only one rr:objectMap did I understand correctly your question/issue? If it is not the case, we have a non-conforming R2RML TC Boris [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/#R2RMLTC0008c
Received on Monday, 5 March 2012 23:55:04 UTC