- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:32:47 +0100
- To: Ivan Mikhailov <imikhailov@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: "public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org" <public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org>
Ivan, That's excellent news, thanks! I've updated [1] with it - Boris, pls take this into account for the IR. Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Implementations#PR_transition_-_Implementation_Report -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel.: +353 91 495730 WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i On 28 Jun 2012, at 22:49, Ivan Mikhailov wrote: > Hello, > > The attached report is incomplete because I'm still writing th test > driver. E.g. if R2RML rules mention graph then it is handled according > to the spec but in that case I need a comparison for lists of quads to > check the result automatically, I compare only triples ATM so such tests > remains not listed. > In addition, Virtuoso provides separate validator for R2RML descriptions > and a separate translator from R2RML to proprietary mapping rules > (so-called "RDF Views". Obviously, there's no way to demonstrate via > EARL whether this validation really works, but it is. > We've implemented DirectMapping as well but that results are not > included into this EARL. Again, it's an incomplete test driver. > > I will submit more EARLs later. > > Best Regards, > > Ivan Mikhailov > OpenLink Software > http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com > > P.S. The test suite has "create.sql" scripts but no "drop.sql" to revert > the database to its original state. To make tests re-entrant I've > generated "drop" sequences automatically, but ready-to-use "drop.sql" > would be nicer, esp. for cases with foreign keys. It would be convenient > to provide names to constraints, too. > > <Rdb2RdfW3c1206_virtuoso_earl.ttl>
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 07:33:23 UTC