- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:51:23 +0200
- To: ashok.malhotra@oracle.com
- Cc: public-rdb2rdf-wg@w3.org
On Jun 12, 2012, at 13:27 , ashok malhotra wrote: > Please look at Toby Inkster's EARL reports. He has 4 reasons for failing tests: > 1. Has not implemented a feature (yet) > 2. Some weird Unicode bug > 3. Database does not support feature > 4. He gives blank nodes a skolemized id where the test does not (I think this is OK) > The question is, is such an EARL report acceptable? I am not sure what you mean by 'acceptable'. If the EARL report clearly states that a specific test is not passed, then it can go into the report and we are fine. The goal is that each feature, ie, each test, should be passed by at least two (or was it three? we should check what we said at the CR transition) implementations. There may be tests that Toby passes and some others do not not... I may misunderstand what you asked, though Ivan > All the best, Ashok > > On 6/12/2012 4:06 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> Hey Michael, >> >> just a note below: >> >> On Jun 12, 2012, at 12:34 , Michael Hausenblas wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> Please find below the agenda for our today's conference call. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Michael >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> AGENDA Teleconference >>> W3C RDB2RDF Working Group telephone conference 2012-06-12 >>> ---------------------------------------------------------- >>> *16:00-17:00 UTC* >>> Local time: >>> >>> http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=06&day=12&year=2012&hour=16&min=00&sec=0 >>> >>> >>> Bridge US: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim) >>> Conference code: 7322733# (spells "RDB2RDF") >>> IRC channel : #RDB2RDF on irc.w3.org:6665 W3C >>> --------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> Chair: Michael >>> Scribe: TBD >>> >>> >>> 1. Admin >>> >>> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2012/05/22-RDB2RDF-minutes.html >>> >>> >>> 2. Implementation Report >>> >>> + http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Implementations >>> + http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Submitting_Test_Results >>> >>> Current status (vai Ashok and mailing list): >>> >>> Known WG-internal: >>> >>> + Richard: Will implement both R2RML and DM >>> + Juan : Will implement both R2RML and DM >>> + Nuno: Will implement both R2RML and DM >>> + Boris: Will implement R2RML >>> + Eric: Will implement DM >>> >>> Known WG-external: >>> >>> + Toby Inkster: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-comments/2012Jun/0014.html >> The real question is: by when? That will determine moving to PR... So it would be good if all implementers had a good, educated guess for the time to be able to plan. >> >> 'See' you this evening >> >> Ivan >> >> >>> >>> 3. Test Cases >>> >>> + http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/test-cases/ >>> + Status re open issues, TC to be fixed? >>> >>> >>> 4. AOB >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >>> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >>> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >>> Ireland, Europe >>> Tel.: +353 91 495730 >>> WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i >>> >>> >> >> ---- >> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >> mobile: +31-641044153 >> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >> >> >> >> >> >> > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 11:47:36 UTC