Re: LC Status and implementation reports

On Jan 26, 2012, at 8:52 AM, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> wrote:

> The two things we have to decide now are
> 
> - what is the end-date for the CR. I guess it depends on the status of the various implementations we have in the group; that gives us a minimum time. Ie, implementers speak up: how much time do you think you need?

Ultrawrap's support for DM and R2RML will be ready by end of February

> 
> - as you say, we may want to set up a separate mailing list for the test case reports. I must admit I do not have strong feelings about that

+1 to use the comments mailing list

> 
> In any case, these two issues have to be decided for the transition call. The format and other things can be done around or after the call and CR publication.
> 
> Ivan
> 
> 
> 
> On Jan 26, 2012, at 15:35 , ashok malhotra wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 1/26/2012 6:25 AM, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>>> Where are we in terms of being able to tell the world how to submit tests results?
>> We are running late on this.  First, are we happy with the test cases?  We have not reviewed them in some time.  Second, did we decide a format for submitting test case results?  We discussed this but I don't remember a resolution.  Third, should we create a separate mailing list for test case reports?
>> 
>> Ashok
>> 
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 18:13:58 UTC